Well. .. I moved on to a new teaching position. Much more like I thought teaching should be. Happy. .. All good.
The Journey! A blog that follows a journey from redundancy into a year of teacher training that led on to a challenging and far from ideal 1st teaching experience but which then subsequently resulted in a move in to the best teaching jobs in the world . . . .
About Roset
- Roset
- No words can explain how deeply people want to connect with each other. How much pain they will suffer trying to be accepted, to be valued and to be loved. The yearning to be wanted is probably the most trauma that some individuals will ever inflict up on themselves. No matter race, colour, creed, sexual orientation, religion, culture, gender, age or any other factor, what everyone wants is to belong, to connect, to be loved. It is so easy to reach out to someone yet, for some it is the most difficult thing to find someone to connect to. Reach out to those you meet in your daily march. You just never know whose life you might touch, what spark, even unknowingly, you may make.
Friday, 27 September 2013
Monday, 2 September 2013
New job - different experience . . .
Wednesday, 21 August 2013
My top six lessons learnt so far . . .
Tuesday, 6 August 2013
Dictatorial' style sees principal sacked - This could equally apply to Heads of Depts, CEOs, Directors, Managers and other leaders etc
'Dictatorial' style sees principal sacked
Former Bay of Islands College principal Elgin Edwards has failed to have his sacking ruled unjustified and to be reinstated.
In a decision today, the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) said a constant theme had been Edwards' apparent inability to build enduring relationships with other stakeholders in the school community and his explicit refusal to accept that he had ever done anything wrong.
Edwards became principal of the Kawakawa school in January 2010, and after that a new board of trustees sought help from the Ministry of Education through a statutory intervention.
In January 2012, Beverley Pitkethley was appointed limited statutory manager of the school, and she was followed by Carol Anderson in June 2012.
For all practical purposes, Anderson became Edwards' employer. She dismissed him in April this year.
Evidence heard by the ERA was essentially that the board of trustees had felt it was unable to cope with a deteriorating environment at the school, authority member James Crichton said in the decision.
Two board members had given evidence of their growing anxiety about the relationship breakdown within the wider school community, which they attributed to Edwards' approach.
Pitkethley told the authority that in the first few months of her appointment she formed a positive view of Edwards' goals for pupil achievement but a negative view of his methods, the ERA decision said.
"She described his style as 'authoritarian and dictatorial', referred to 'an absence of any meaningful consultation', a reluctance by the principal to engage personally with the school and its community, including his failure to be seen 'out and about' around the school, and a comprehensive breakdown in the relationship with the local community," it said.
Pitkethley had said the board, like staff, felt "marginalised, patronised and disempowered" by Edwards.
"Ms Pitkethley also saw an unwillingness on the part of Mr Edwards to accept that any of the negative consequences were his responsibility and he preferred to analyse things in terms of a conspiracy of negative-minded staff," the decision said.
Anderson, after taking over as the limited statutory manager, said in a letter to Edwards last September that he needed to change the way he operated.
Edwards had maintained in evidence to the authority that Anderson had developed a negative approach to him immediately and set about overwhelming him with complaints, requests and allegations, the decision said.
Unsuccessful mediation had taken place last year, with further mediation in January 2013.
In February this year, a formal support and guidance action plan drawn up by Anderson for Edwards was implemented, although Edwards raised concerns about it.
About that time, a complaint was received about Edwards' treatment of a staff member.
A meeting in March this year between Anderson and Edwards was terminated, with Anderson's evidence being that Edwards had become "heated and vehement".
Edwards had said it was his idea to end the conversation and that he had been "calm and gentle", and Anderson had become "agitated and personal".
"You then stood over me and berated me with personal comments about how I looked," he said.
In a letter to Edwards in late March, Anderson said "the situation is no longer tenable", and asked Edwards to make himself available for "a final opportunity" to respond to concerns.
Edwards' counsel had said phrases used in the letter indicated Anderson had already decided to dismiss Edwards at that stage, but the ERA disagreed.
While the letter could have been more judiciously worded, particularly to make clear Anderson's conclusions were preliminary, it would have been wrong to hold those provisional conclusions back from Edwards, the authority said.
The parties met at a disciplinary meeting in mid-April. According to Anderson, Edwards did not take as fulsome an opportunity to defend his position as she would have expected, the ERA decision said.
By letter dated two days later, Anderson sacked Edwards.
The decision said the dismissal was in the context of a long-running dispute between Edwards and a succession of employer parties about his behaviour, and in particular about his inability to build wholesome relationships with the people around him.
" ... a constant theme was Mr Edwards' apparent inability to build enduring relationships with other stakeholders in the school community and his explicit refusal until the authority's investigation meeting to accept that he had ever done anything wrong," the ERA said.
" This abrupt righteousness, which seems characteristic of his behaviour in his time at the school, has done him little service."
The ERA determined Edwards had been justifiably dismissed.
- © Fairfax NZ News
Tuesday, 30 July 2013
Tall poppy syndrome!
For those of you who may not be familiar with this saying, Wikipedia describes the tall poppy syndrome as: “a social phenomenon in which people of genuine merit are resented, attacked, cut down, or criticised because their talents or achievements elevate them above or distinguish them from their peers”.
As you continue to grow your business and increase your credibility and reputation within your field, not only will you capture the attention of your potential prospect/clients – you’ll also be noticed by your competitors and other people in your circle.
And, unfortunately, some of these people may not always have your best interests at heart. In fact, you may find that they try to hinder your progress through a direct attack on you personally and your work, or they’ll try to drag you down with their critical (naysayer) comments and/or actions.
I’m not talking about constructive criticism where someone is trying to offer you advice with good intentions because they want to see you grow and prosper.
I’m referring to the vindictive comments that are coming from a place of ‘do or die competitiveness’ or out of spite and envy with the sole intent on tarnishing your credibility or keeping you down.
In preparing for this article, I reached out to my social network and asked whether any of them had been a victim of the tall poppy syndrome. Sadly, many people could relate to this.
One woman found herself without a job after she had exposed several things to upper management that needed to be brought to their attention. Apparently her supervisor didn’t appreciate her new rise to fame and quickly saw to it that she was removed.
A few years later she opened her own business and was frequently told by people in her community that she’d never achieve the goals that she had set for herself.
So, if like this woman, you too have someone who is going out of their way to ‘attack, cut down or criticise you’ – what do you do? Should you come out fighting? Should you retaliate and serve them back some of their medicine? You know – tit for tat? Or do you just simply ignore them and hope they’ll go away?
Whatever you decide, I believe it’s important to hold true to your integrity and honour so that you can continue to hold your head up high.
Here are 3 tips to consider if ever you find yourself at the receiving end of the ‘tall poppy syndrome’.
1. Don’t stoop to their level
I think the most important thing to do is to avoid retaliation where you come out fighting and throwing negative comments back at them.
Stooping to their level and ‘serving them up a spoonful of their own medicine’ will only serve to take your attention, energy and focus away from what you SHOULD be focusing on – which is to continue the great work that you’re doing.
Action Step: Don’t get caught up in anger, frustration or retaliation – you’re worth so much more! Rather let your light shine brightly and continue to bring your message to the world, so that you can carry on helping the people who you know you are meant to serve.
2. Realise – it’s NOT about you
It’s important to realise that their remarks have nothing to do with you and the work you are doing, but rather EVERYTHING to do with them and their inability to achieve their own successes.
It’s THEIR stuff – their own issues and lack of self-worth and/or self-belief – and has nothing to do with you!
Action Step: Remind yourself of your mission and purpose and the people you are here to serve. Listening to the naysayers and critics will only delay you from achieving your bigger mission. Move on.
And, most important of all, is to:
3. Surround yourself with supportive people
Do you feel physically and emotionally drained after being in someone’s company where you have listened to their negative remarks? Being in the company of these naysayers and critics WILL impact your outcomes.
Are the people you associate with constantly telling you why something can’t be done, or why your plans are impossible to achieve? Perhaps that’s true for them. However are you going to let this person’s inability to reach their goals affect your ability to reach yours? I certainly hope not!
Action Step: Surround yourself with supportive people – people who will continue to encourage you to be the best you can be and who will celebrate alongside you as you continue to move from success to success.
The important thing to remember is to hold true to who you are and the work you do; keep your eyes firmly fixed on your goals; and to build a community of like-minded people who will continue to inspire and uplift you on your journey.
Did you find this article helpful? Have you been a victim of the tall poppy syndrome? What did you do? Share your stories/comments. It’s always great to hear from you!
- to LinkedIn969696969696969696
- Post to Google+
- Post to Twitter108108108108108108108108108
Monday, 29 July 2013
My top six lessons learnt so far . . .
Must read books for new teachers
Phil Beadle
- How to deal with chewing gum
- Watch out for these work avoidance techniques
- The importance of a good seating plan
- A realistic guide to lesson planning
Not Quite a Teacher: target practice for beginning teachers
Tom Bennett
- Preparing for your first job
- Class rules
- Advice on the most effective way to mark homework
- How long does it take to win over a class?
The Ultimate Teaching manual: a route to success
Gererd Dixie
- Tried and tested questioning strategies
- A guide to getting to know your pupils
- Introducing pace and purpose into your lessons
- Top tips for teaching EAL pupils
A guerilla guide to teaching: the definitive resource for new teachers
Sue Cowley
- Top 10 strategies for encouraging good behaviour
- Coping with your first day
- Lesson planning: Getting a balance of activities